The Sheriff safely protects every other city on the Palos Verdes Peninsula: RPV, RHE & RH
Click HEREfor Publicly Available YouTube videos regarding Measure E
Los Angeles Sheriff: Twice the Protection
at Half the Price?
(EQUAL RESPONSE TIME vs. PVEPD)
Who Truly Has Deep Experience with Criminals and Can Enlarge to Engage Sizable Threats? Every week, the average LASD deputy encounters a broad array of felony and misdemeanor activity around the Peninsula and LA County — situations to which the PVEPD would be totally unaccustomed and thus unprepared; in the event of an outbreak of crime, the LASD can Expandits local PVE force three-fivefold within one hour — the PVEPD is constrained by its tiny on-duty force. PV Peninsula Expertiseincludes each LASD squad car accessing the LASD database showing all LASD contacts with potential or witnessed criminals — a network to which outside-the-network PVEPD squad cars have no access. The PVEPD simply would not know if it encountered one of these criminals, potentially allowing him/her to continue within our city.
$7,000 – $20,000 More in YOUR Pocket: Over the 9-year Parcel Tax period, each PVE property taxpayer will save ~ $7,000 – $20,000 by moving to the experienced L.A. Sheriff
PVE Government Hid the One Crucial Fact from Voters: For the six months preceding the 2017 Measure D vote, Tony Dahlerbruch never gave voters the straight story on cost/benefit
Don’t Trust PVE City Council’s Lies: There is nothing “cheap,” “lowball,” or bait-and-switch about the contract offered by the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department.
RPV Sheriff Cost Has Remained Flat: contrary to the misinformation from PVECC, there is no evidence that Sheriff’s pricing escalates precipitously whatsoever (Source: RPV Budget Report)
Lunada Bay Boys/PVEPD Non-enforcement & City’s REPEATED Attempts to Tax Properties Is Depreciating Attractiveness of PVE vs. Other South Bay Cities: while other LA County home values skyrocket, interest in PVE homes remains relatively tepid
Measure D Tax on PVE Properties Is Taking Its Toll: Listing price on this property fell 25% over five-month City battle to pass $70-90 million parcel tax (September 2016 – February 2017)
Illegally Placed Parkway Lawn Signspromulgated by PVEPD group headed by Sergeant Steve Barber: despite Barber’s questionable efforts to gather resident accomplices, PVE voters turned out in 33-year record high numbers to vote down Measure D, saving taxpayers $70-90 million.
FOR VOTER CONSIDERATION:
Sheriff Protection Twice that of PVEPD: Since identical number of patrol cars shall be positioned throughout tiny geography of PVE, LASD Response Time Equal to that of PVEPD. Moreover, the LASD has offered the following as well:
12% or 50% more patrol service hours from highly trained and experienced deputies, plus one field sergeant in the field each shift (vs. PVEPD sergeant often sitting at desk in PVEPD station);
Sheriff Will Protect PVE for Well Under HALF the PVEPD’s Cost: why vote to tax your own home in order to pay over TWICE what the Sheriff quoted PVE?
Sheriff Will Increase Patrol by 50% over PVEPD for $3 million/year less PVEPD’s $7.5 million/year Cost: the Sheriff will shift Peninsula deployment to PVE acting as a force multiplier for the city, and assign a Lieutenant to PVE Police HQ.
Lomita Station Location Advantages (on Narbonne): if PVE decides to go with the lower-cost $3.5 million Option A, the benefits would be as follows:
Unlike PVEPD officers frequently pulling themselves off street patrol in order to fraternize at closeby PVEPD HQ, the distance to the LASD Lomita station makes that misconduct impractical and infeasible;
PVE residences closer to the LASD Lomita Station/RPV (Lunada Bay), which are neglected to the benefit of Malaga Cove streets near PVEPD HQ, now will have a fair chance at law enforcement patrolling their neighborhood and faster response times; and
PVE residences closer to the LASD Lomita Station/RPV (Lunada Bay) under the Sheriff will have the benefit of faster access to the entire RPV Sheriff patrol force in the event of an emergency requiring rapid expansion of law enforcement coverage/protection.
Experience stunting hard crime throughout LA County, as compared to low-crime and thus low-experience for PVEPD officers who graduated from Rio Hondo (vs. Sheriff Academy);
Expansion capability: squad cars in force can multiply 3-5 fold within one hour to accommodate a surge in crime;
Expertisethrough entire Peninsula, including access to LASD squad car database of criminal interface and contact (PVEPD squad cars have no access to this);
Dan Beringeras station chief with sterling leadership record (vs. Kepley sued for negligence);
Priority LASD Helicopter access; and
Sheriff services that do not even exist within the PVEPD: SWAT (Special Weapons and Tactics), gang suppression specialists, etc.
PVE community programs (PVE-Cares started by PVEPD hero fmr. Chief Dan Dreiling) transferred to low cost and headcount PVE organization.
Sheriff COST Less than HALF that of PVEPD: For all of the above, $3.4 million annual, contained cost, including liability, vs. PVEPD costing taxpayers $7.5 million, with never-ending, escalating long term pension costs. Over 9 years, voting down the Parcel Tax in April 2018 is set to save you, the PVE taxpayers, an estimated $30 – $35 million — with PVE residents being in the safer hands of the Los Angeles Sheriff.
PVEPD Simply Doesn’t Have the Resources of the Sheriff Department: should PVE residents ever need extraordinary law enforcement, we are going to wish we’d hired the Sheriff
BOTTOM LINE FOR VOTERS: This easy, law enforcement enhancing budget solution of hiring the LASD shall continue to play a significant role in Measure D failing . Why transfer $70 million of PVE taxpayer money into a police department’s pockets if you simply do not need to do so? Why not instead save all that money for your own retirement, your family’s regular needs or your kids’ education? It is important for residents to recognize that PVE is uniquely fortunate not to require a huge law enforcement budget due to the City being inherently safe. This is due to its remote location away from freeways/dangerous regions, few/narrow entry points, ocean and famously efficient Torrance PD protected borders, and mature/affluent demographics that lead to only rare occasion of PVE resident lawbreaking. So ask yourself, “Why is PVE spending > 95% of our property taxes, nearly 60% of the entire budget and 400% of what RPV pays per resident on its LASD police force, especially during a budget crisis?”
PVEPD Union Head Steve Barber: opposed anycuts to staffing at the PVE Police Department.
DATE: March 28, 2017
TO: PVE Taxpaying Voters
SUBJECT: PVE Govt. Moves Closer to Replacing PVEPD w/ Sheriff
The Coalition to Save PVE has learned that Palos Verdes Estates municipal government, headed by City Manager Tony Dahlerbruch, over the past week has moved closer to the reasonable determination to replace the PVEPD (click here) with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (LASD) Lomita Station, headed by highly respected veteran Capt. Dan Beringer (click here).
PVE City Hall Has Pivoted Its Response to Demands for LASD Hiring from “False” to “Undetermined” Following $4 Million Savings Document Leak: As of today on March 28, 2017, PVE city management prudently rectified to “undetermined” from “false” its response to heightened resident demands for the replacement of the 60% budget consuming PVEPD with the lower cost/higher performance LASD. To the satisfaction of an increasing percentage of surveyed PVE taxpayers, it appears that Tony Dahlerbruch (click here) may be reacting to the Coalition’s recent procurement and dissemination of a previously sequestered City document. This PVE staff report (see excerpt in next section below) exposed Dahlerbruch’s obfuscation of the details of a late 2016 LASD contract proposal to provide 12% more patrol service hours than the PVEPD for merely $3.4 million/year vs. the PVEPD’s $7.4 million annual cost. This recent LASD quote equates to a $4 million first-year savings and less than half the PVEPD’s budgeted cost of $7.4 million/year, despite the LASD’s more experienced officers providing 12% more patrol service hours than PVEPD’s current deployment. The ~ $4 million annual savings from contracting with the LASD would plug 85% of the $4.7 million budget hole derived from PVE’s residents’ well reasoned March 7th rejection of Measure D’s unnecessary 12-year perpetuation.
PVE government/Dahlerbruch on March 28, 2017 re-labeled the “rumored” demand for the $3.4 million LASD contract as “Undetermined.”
PVE government/Dahlerbruch on March 21, 2017 mislabeled the “rumored” demand for the $3.4 million LASD contract as “False.”
PVE Government/Tony Dahlerbruch Obfuscated from PVE Taxpaying Voters LASD Contract at Less than HALF of PVEPD Cost to City: In what appears to be yet another case of corruption by Palos Verdes Estates government under Tony Dahlerbruch, the City posted on its website ahead of the March 7th Measure D vote fallacious information patently designed to influence the Measure D vote. This informational array ensconced from PVE taxpaying voters the crucial particular that the LASD offered a contract to PVE with 12% more patrol service hours than PVEPD deployment, and did so at a cost of less than half of the PVEPD’s expense to the City’s resident taxpayers. Through a formal document request under the California Public Records Act (CPRA), a member of the Coalition to Save PVE obtained the following excerpted summary of Tony Dahlerbruch’s “LASD Staffing Study” dated September 28, 2016.
PVE Government Hid the One Crucial Fact from Voters: For the six months preceding the 2017 Measure D vote, Tony Dahlerbruch never gave voters the straight story on cost/benefit
PVE voters should make serious note of this date being nearly six months before the March 7, 2017 Measure D vote, despite the key details of this crucial cost/deployment comparison never being provided, much less promulgated by Tony Dahlerbruch and his City Council cohorts Jennifer King, John Rea, Betty Lin Peterson, Jim Vandever and Jim Goodhart. PVE residents now in possession of this information have concluded that the exclusion of this LASD Staffing Study was intentionally done in order to improperly influence the vote’s outcome. That feared outcome, Measure D failing to be sufficiently approved, was anticipated by Tony Dahlerbruch and his colleagues to make their own, personal jobs more demanding due to a $1 million, 50% cut to their own finance/administration staffs’ budget allocation (click here and see Page 2). Therein appears to lie the true motive behind Tony Dahlerbruch’s self serving actions and inactions as described herein.
PVE Police Department Over TWICE the Cost as Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department, despite the latter providing 12% more patrol service hours
PVE Government/Tony Dahlerbruch Improperly Sought to Influence Election. To be clear, as PVE City Hall reportedly became increasingly concerned that voters were leaning against paying an estimated $70 million – $90 million in unnecessary parcel taxes over 12 years (via Measure D), City Manager Dahlerbruch guided the City’s website to post this claim on March 3, 2017 (click here), “In the interest of providing factual information about the special parcel tax and the City’s contract with the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACoFD), the City has compiled a set of files and records on the City website for public review.” However, it seems Tony Dahlerbruch did not want this factual information to include the basic summary of the LASD’s law enforcement proposal for 12% more service patrol hours at less than half of the PVEPD cost. Clicking through the website (click here) provided access to a plethora of PVE City government hand-selected statistics and documents, including a detailed FAQ page (click here) and numerous “fact sheets” (click here). Despite Tony Dahlerbuch and his cohorts on the City Council scribing and compiling 1000s and 1000s’ of words, statistics and comparative studies, the Coalition’s review has found not one single instance of Dahlerbruch evincing the crucial swing-vote-determining fact that the highly competent, trained and staffed LASD offered PVE taxpaying residents 12% more patrol service hours at a cost less than half of the PVEPD — $4 million in savings that would plug 85% of the budget hole caused by the Parcel Tax’s being voted down by wise PVE taxpaying voters.
DATE: February 24, 2017
TO: PVE Voters & Eligible Captains and Sergeants
SUBJECT: Palos Verdes Estates Police Department Chief
of Police Retirement/Resignation Demanded
The Coalition to Save PVE, following PVE Police Chief Jeffrey Kepley’s POA engaging in alleged fraud (see apparently intentional misrepresentation on POA/Measure D lawn sign below), today demanded the termination of Kepley as PVE Chief of Police. For nearly two years, the Coalition has held Kepley under investigation relating to perceived ineffective and weak leadership of the PVEPD (see link below). With the Bay Boys litigation and other signs of incompetence and misconduct mounting, we no longer felt it prudent to defer this demand beyond a deadline of June 1, 2017.
PVEPD Is Campaigning for Measure D to Prolong Its Egregiously Excessive Compensation, NOT to “Save” the Department: The PVEPD knows full well that Measure D (Parcel Tax) being rejected would NOT result in a material, if any diminution in law enforcement efficacy. As the PVEPD is aware, Measure D/the Parcel Tax deals almost exclusively with fire, and not law enforcement services. In the fortunate event that Measure D is struck down, PVE’s City Council would continue to fund the PVEPD exactly the same the day after the vote as the day before. What the PVEPD does fear, however, is that the removal of excess parcel tax revenues from the PVE budget eventually would compel a prudent, reconstituted City Council to examine for inefficiencies (e.g., overtime) the City’s #1 expense – the PVEPD. Please don’t trust the Coalition on this view – you may read below what the PVE Mayor (Jim Nyman) who invented the Parcel Tax has to say about Measure D. What soon should become apparent to PVE voters, with the POA’s distribution of intentionally misleading lawn signs, is that the PVEPD appears willing to do anything to perpetuate the leaking flood of PVE taxpayer savings into the PVEPD officers’ pockets. With $125,000 – $210,000/year/officer compensation for a 3-day workweek of driving safely in scenic loops around our small, naturally safe city (click here), this all adds up quickly in a department with a staggeringly high headcount (see photo below).
PVE Naturally Has Very Low Crime: The Coalition, of course like the rest of PVE’s residents, supports the City maintaining an effective law enforcement operation. However, the expense of that police operation should correlate somewhat to the naturally, normally low level of crime in PVE. In parts of Los Angeles (e.g., South Central) with significant hard crime, the residents reasonably may support just about any amount of expenditure on police force. However, PVE is uniquely fortunate to possess various geographic and demographic traits that provide a natural “moat” around it. PVE’s remote location away from freeways and inner-city areas, along with few narrow entry points, makes it too difficult a city for most criminals to target. Furthermore, the Torrance Police Department’s famously strict law enforcement along PVE’s border further buttresses PVE’s “safety moat.” Lastly, PVE’s mature and affluent demographics tend not to engage in much law breaking, particularly of the hard/dangerous variety. For emphasis, all of these permanent traits of PVE provide a naturally low crime rate, which should itself give solace to PVE voters focused on peace and tranquility. A more efficiently structured and managed PVEPD will not result in any material increase in crime. The extremely unusual burglary wave that hit PVE in late 2015 was neither the PVEPD’s fault nor something that its overpaid, overstaffed department was needed to impede. If PVE had a police department at half or twice its current bloated size and expense, those burglars still would have shown up and committed their crimes. In naturally safe cities such as PVE, there is nothing practical any police department can do to prevent this from happening.
PVEPD Budget is Out of Control: Despite all these natural advantages that counter law breaking, in last year’s PVE budget the PVEPD consumed nearly 60% of PVE’s entire budget (up from 41% the prior year) — a total amount of expense that equated to over 99% of all of the property tax revenue received by the City. Ponder for a minute PVE’s law enforcement budget at nearly 150% of that of RPV (click here), despite RPV having triple the square miles to patrol and triple the population to serve. RPV spends only 15% of its entire budget and only 38% of RPV’s property tax revenue on law enforcement, despite naturally having more crime due to extensive borders with higher crime areas (e.g. San Pedro/Los Angeles) and less favorable demographics.
PVE Police Department Budget Exploding the City’s Budget: from an already overwhelming $6.5 million cost to PVE taxpayers a few years ago, the 2017-2018 cost of the PVEPD has escalated to $7.4 million vs. the $3.4 million L.A. County Sheriff quote offering 12% MORE patrol service hours over the PVEPD
PVEPD May Be Managed Effectively and Efficiently Under Captain Mark Velez: The Coalition understands that PVEPD Captain Mark Velez conditionally stands willing and able to run the PVEPD following Jeff Kepley’s termination. Though we have some reservations, the experiment of bringing someone (Kepley) from the outside to manage the PVEPD has proven disastrous. Kepley will leave in his wake a city littered with law non-enforcement so rampant that both he and the City have been sued by alleged crime victims who felt they had no alternative due to Kepley’s “indifference.”
In the event Velez is not chosen, PVEPD Chief candidates should have at least ten (10) years of law enforcement experience at the captain or sergeant level or higher, with preference being given to applicants who reside or would relocate to reside in Palos Verdes Estates coincident with their prospective hiring. After initial screening by the Coalition, penultimate and final round candidates will be introduced to the PVE City Council, non-sponsoring this process but ultimately responsible for Kepley’s replacement, for further review. Candidates are encouraged to reply hereto with a resume in Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat digital format, along with a separate submission listing references who may be available as part of the pre-Council review process. Confidentiality of applicants shall be respected; only following applicant written consent shall his/her application become conveyable by the Coalition to any outside party.
Please see the PVE Police Department Wall of Shame for more information:
Illegally Placed Parkway Lawn Signs promulgated by PVEPD group headed by Sergeant Steve Barber: despite Barber’s widespread efforts to gain resident accomplices, PVE voters turned out in 33-year record numbers wisely to vote down Measure D, saving taxpayers $70-90 million.
On the ballot on March 7 will be the re-enactment of the PVE Parcel Tax to fund fire services. I know quite a lot about this tax as I ‘invented’ (authored?) it about 30 years ago. Trust me, at that time we really needed the money! But the tax was an interim measure and was not supposed to last forever. Now they are using the full resources of the city to push through 12 more years of this tax with an authorized annual increase of 6.2%. Plus the City is actively pushing a campaign of deception to attempt to make people think that everyone else pays more for than we do. This is a lie and they know it is – I guess I should say ‘factually incorrect.’
These are the facts:
·No other property owner in PV or CALIFORNIA pays this tax. Fire services are funded out of the 1% (Prop 13) property tax that we all pay. I have provided sample tax bills from PVE, Rancho (redacted), and San Pedro. So, you can verify that we (only) pay this tax. (My PVE tax is $1213.60 – the first example tax bill – no one else has this line item or tax!)
·The “Citizen’s Advisory Committee was a total joke – they didn’t find $1 in savings nor did they attempt to do so. A casual look at the property tax revenues in PVE would have shown that the property tax revenues are forecast to grow at 8.44% this year alone (PVE staff estimate) and they a have grown at about 7% for the last 30 years – so, with any amount of decent management the fire tax could sunset/disappear in a very short time.
·When you view the property tax income in PV it immediately becomes apparent that something is horribly wrong: the other 3 cities all receive about 23.3% of the property tax dollar while PVE gets 11.3% ..AMAZING BUT TRUE. Why? I have no idea but this has been going on UNQUESTIONED for 39 years (since 1978). And, all four cities have the same School District, the same Library District, the same Community College District and the same (County) fire services. Ask your elected officials why PVE is getting the short end of the stick! By the way, even Hermosa Beach gets 20%! If we only got our fair share we could fund the fire contract and have money to spare – yet the Citizen’s Advisory Committee did not study this nor recommend any change! Incredible.
Please forward this message and attachment to everyone you know in PVE and please ask questions. Look, it’s like your kid is addicted to cocaine (except our City is addicted to our money). We need to vote this down then immediately put together a REAL Citizen’s Advisory Committee and immediately task the City Attorney and City staff to find out why PVE is not getting its fair share of the tax dollar and immediately institute a hiring freeze and other measures to try to find a path to fiscal solvency. I think the new, smaller, revised, fire tax could be eliminated within a short time – about 4 years.
Vote it down – send it back to the City – REJECTED!
OVERVIEW OF ENDORSEMENT: The Coalition to Save PVE, after interaction with all three candidates for PVE City Council for the March 7, 2017 election, has determined to endorse Kenneth Kao. The choice came down to Kenny Kao or Sandy Davidson, as Jim Goodhart’s egregiously foolish behavior as a councilman knocked him out of the running at the outset. The decision for Kao was an easy one given that the foundation of a good councilperson is one who consistently honors his/her fiduciary duties of due care and loyalty to PVE residents. To put this in more colloquial terms, Palos Verdes Estates residents want representatives who in making decisions a) gather material, relevant and consequential information (the facts) and then b) exercise sound judgment utilizing that information (i.e., know what to do with those facts). Kenny Kao has exhibited behavior that leads us to believe he will engage in precisely that approach. When a question is unclear to him, Kao asks for clarification or it to be repeated. When asked a question on a subject in which he has little experience, he modestly admits that and commits to studying the facts, rather than winging it or spouting inanities. Click herefor video evidence of these qualities. This is the behavior of a prudent decision maker, making Kenneth Kao perhaps the most qualified, gifted candidate for PVE City Council in decades. Therefore, he is getting our votes at the Palos Verdes Estates election on March 7th.
DUTY OF DUE CARE: The duty of care requires a councilperson or appointed officer to make decisions after taking all available information into account, and then act in a judicious manner that promotes PVE’s best interests. The three components scrutinized in determining if a councilperson exercised due care are did he a) fulfill his duty of care by acting in a reasonably prudent manner when making the decision, 2) conduct an adequate degree of due diligence, and 3) act in good faith. It is this duty that most often has been violated by Tony Dahlerbruch, Sheri Repp Loadsman, Christi Hogin, Ken Rukavina, Rob Olson, and the incumbent PVE City Council. As seen starkly in the Via Panorama parkland (click here) and Big Orange illegal cycling signage and enforcement disputes, these fiduciaries imprudently made bad decisions after conducting inadequate due diligence. Moreover, the ample evidence uncovered by John Harbison (in discovery; click here) of attempts to cover their duty-violating tracks indicates that bad faith also played a role in the horrific outcomes of their actions. In the case of PVE Chief of Police Jeff Kepley, his globally and embarrassingly notorious bungling of the Lunada Bay Boys conflict (click here) is one of myriad examples of Kepley’s incompetence that dishonored his duty of due care to PVE. Breaches of due care by these fiduciaries is displayed in great detail on the PVE City Hall Wall of Shame (click here).
DUTY OF LOYALTY: The duty of loyalty requires a councilperson or appointed officer to act at all times in the best interests of PVE. The duty of loyalty requires a councilperson or appointed officer to be completely loyal to PVE at all times. It also imposes the responsibility to avoid possible conflicts of interest, thereby precluding a councilperson from self-dealing or taking advantage of a municipal opportunity for personal gain. Violation of the duty of loyalty may expose the councilperson to a court order to pay restitution and stiff fines. It is this duty that most often has been violated by the PVE Police Department headed by Jeff Kepley and John Eberhard. Breaches of loyalty to PVE by these two police chiefs are displayed in great detail on the PVE Police Department Wall of Shame (click here).
PRO’S OF KENNY KAO FOR PVE CITY COUNCIL. Kenny Kao is an energetic family (3 school-age kids) and businessman who will do his homework before making a thoughtful, well reasoned, prudent decision that he believes is in the best interest of Palos Verdes Estates. Our endorsement of Kenny Kao comes down to that basic observation which, as you have read above, satisfies the honoring of his duties of due care and loyalty to PVE. The Coalition bases its opinion on the following evidence:
1) Integrity: We at the Coalition have no shortage of experience dealing with unscrupulous PVE government officials (and thus the existence of this website). Though this is just our judgment call, our read on Kenny Kao is that he is as honest a politician as one could desire, especially at the local level. Time will tell if we got this part right.
2) Experience: PVE Traffic Safety Committee (4 years) and PVE Planning Committee (2 years); Sanford Davidson falls terribly short here, as seen when he was exposed as having no understanding of the federal law mandating cell phone towers in PVE (click here).
3) Intelligence: Boalt law school and articulate speaker; Sandy Davidson falls short here as seen by his political website’s vague and at times factually incorrect content, combined his odd behavior during the February candidates forum (click here and here).
4) Independence: Kao fought PVE deputy city manager Sheri Repp Loadsman on her disloyal plan to permit Airbnb/Short term rentals. He also has stated publicly he is against selling parkland. Sanford Davidson scores even higher points in this category as a clear outsider and outspoken opponent of the incumbents.
5) Loyalty: Kao grew up in PVE, and his loyalty to his home base shines clear. Kao’s determination not to allow PVE to be the only South Bay/Peninsula city permitting short term residential rentals (Airbnb) is Exhibit A in the case for his loyalty to PVE residents. If not for Kenny Kao, it is the Coalition’s view that Sheri Repp Loadsman would have tricked the PVE Planning Commission into accepting her proposal to permit this heinous residential trend. (Google “Desire Meli Kocarslan” for example of relevance to PVE). Click here and go to around 18:00 to watch Kao hold Repp Loadsman accountable for her deceit. Furthermore, Kenny Kao has reported that he missed not one single PVEPC meeting during his entire tenure thereon.
6) Inquisitiveness: Young and energetic Kenny Kao is hardly indolent, exhibiting the will and skill to hunt down facts to develop a list of pro’s and con’s of any course of action. The Coalition expects Kao to apply this method to researching a solution to rampant illegal cycling by the Big Orange Biker Gang (hint: a new PVE police chief). By contrast, Sandy Davidson appears more a stubborn, mature man disinterested in learning information vs. Kao being an intellectually curious man seeking out the truth.
7) Legacy PVE Club Membership: Kao has made crystal clear he would not support wholesale changes to the PVBAC concession that would escalate membership into already-congested non-pool deck areas. His view is that while 10+ years is a long time, such a waiting period has been residents’ expectation vs. the alternative of daily pass usage. Kao, examining his own position in line, believes that he has waited for 3-4 years and there is no fair rationale to jump the line near those having waited nearly a decade.
CON’S OF KENNY KAO FOR PVE CITY COUNCIL. Kenny Kao is an insider with predictably owed allegiance, based on their endorsement of him for the seat, to the very incumbents on PVE City Council who themselves have breached their duties of due care and loyalty to PVE. This is the one clear downside of his candidacy vs. that of Sandy Davidson. Unfortunately, only time will tell if Kenny Kao is willing and able to confront and counter the very people who helped get him elected into the seat on the dais right next to him. Should he join the long list of PVE elected and appointed officials who regularly breach fiduciary duties to residents, rest assured that the Coalition will go after him with a level of dedication unseen before.
SANDY DAVIDSON CANDIDACY: With two council seats up for grabs, despite our grave reservations of Davidson’s mental fortitude we strongly pray that he, and not Jim Goodhart, joins Kao on the City Counsel dais in March. The indisputably valid selling point of Davidson’s candidacy is his supreme independence from incumbent PVE government (though we worry over his rumored dependence on John Harbison and his mini-cult of followers). Unquestionably, this is not a man who will follow his predecessors’ lead of approving anything emitting even the slightest odor of corruption or waste (except perhaps the PVEPD budget; see below). Of concern, though, is that slow speaking Davidson has come across to members of the Coalition as neither intelligent, informed, nor seemingly very interested in becoming so by doing basic due diligence. It thus has become the Coalition’s strong view that Sandy Davidson is a septuagenarian at the end of his accomplished medical career who, in looking for some purpose in life post-retirement, was encouraged by a growing number of discontent PVE residents to throw his confrontational hat into the local political ring. Furthermore, based on his odd public behavior, some question his mental or emotional normalcy (click here).
Davidson’s bare bones political website (click here) exudes a mastery of truly no topic but instead spouts generalities. One such statement sans specificity is his purported goal to “create reasonable and balanced budgets.” However, Sandy Davidson either is ignorant or doesn’t comprehend the crucial relevance to the PVE budget of the notoriously ineffective PVEPD (click here). Jeff Kepley’s department employs a horde of 3-day workweek, $110,000 – $210,000/year+ compensated officers (click here) whose low risk and elementary job is to drive in scenic loops around a tiny city with almost zero hard crime. Troubling is the PVEPD’s dedication to NOT enforcing a large swath of softer crime (PVEMC and CVC violations). As a result of these huge sums being paid, the greater than $6.6 million PVEPD budget consumed a staggering 57% of the PVE total budget and over 99% of PVE’s property tax revenue (click here).
Also glaringly ignorant is Sandy Davidson’s platform advocacy to “enforce P.V.E. biking ordinances,” (click here), despite the fact that not a single such ordinance even exists to enforce in the first place (click here and search “bicycle”). This damages his credibility when countering the rampant illegal cycling in PVE, allowing the biker gang to target Davidson’s ignorant statement as evidence that a PVE city councilperson demanding bicycle law enforcement has neither clue nor credibility. Worse is the fact that he has been alerted by multiple parties to this error, but despite weeks passing has not made the simple change of three letters to his unrefined website (“P.V.E.” to “CVC”.)
Sanford Davidson Family Involvement with Eagle Forum of California (click here and search page, using CTRL-F, for Joan Davidson)
Jim Goodhart: This is not a person you want making decisions on behalf of PVE residents
JIM GOODHART CANDIDACY: supremely experienced with a decade of tenure on the PVE City Council, but lacking in integrity, intelligence and independence. It is beyond obvious that it is time for Jim Goodhart to hang up his public servant shoes and be sent out to pasture. As strongly as the Coalition endorses Kenny Kao, it renounces Jim Goodhart with even higher conviction. Thus, any PVE resident leaning toward voting for Goodhart may want to give serious consideration to either of the alternatives.
Jim Goodhart Partial List of Breaches of Due Care/Loyalty to PVE:
Personal home property encroaching massively onto public land
Bias in favor of illegal cycling in PVE (he is an avid cyclist himself)
Bloated the PVEPD budget under incompetent Chief Jeff Kepley
Non-response to evidence of Dahlerbruch corruption/waste
Skirting the Truth Even After Humiliating Defeat: Even Jim Godhart’s wife, in a pathetic and fallacious attempt to salvage her social status, refused in admit the entire truth of her husband’s incompetence in PV News letter to editor
Click here for more on Goodhart’s shameful behavior as a councilperson.
NOTE FROM SITE TO CANDIDATES: All those listed on this page are encouraged to contact the site immediately if he/she would like to provide a signed, notarized affidavit exclusively disputing accusations made against him/her. Such affidavit then may be made available on this site, allowing the public to consider “his/her side” of the story.
This web page and related posts and commentary represent both facts and opinions of the Coalition to Save PVE about Sanford Davidson, Kenneth Kao, and James Goodhartas public figures, as well as related parties, as protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Posted comments made by third parties represent their own representations of facts and own opinions.
Dan Dreiling worked as a uniformed patrol officer until 1987. He is extremely proud of his early years on the department, during which Dan was instrumental in starting “Student and the Law” at the High School. Dan wrote the curriculum and taught “Student and the Law” at Palos Verdes High School for approximately three years. Many of his former students continue to keep in touch with him and have themselves, entered the law enforcement profession with other cities. In 1987, Dan Dreiling was assigned as a police detective and worked in this capacity for two years until he was promoted to the rank of sergeant and placed in charge of the detective bureau.
In 1990, Dan Dreiling graduated from the prestigious FBI – National
Academy for Law Enforcement, Class 163. In 1993, he went back to patrol as a sergeant where he worked as a watch commander until his promotion to lieutenant in 1996. During that time, as a collateral duty, Dan Dreiling revised and rewrote the entire departmental policy and procedures manual. For the first time, the manual was bound and officially sanctioned by the Chief of Police and the City CARES, a program designed to render greater assistance and protection to the elderly. The successful program is being considered by other municipalities interested in implementing their own comparable program.
All things included, Dan Dreiling is most proud of the Dreiling family. He has been married to his beautiful and kind wife Robin for over 30 years, and has raised two wonderful sons, Daniel Jason (DJ) and Brian.
INDUCTED to PVEPD WALL OF FAME:
Officer Louis Warnick (Unknown – Present)
Louis Warnick – the man, the officer, and the legend, continues to keep the devil away from the Neighborhood Church with his tenacious, sharp clawed approach to law enforcement
As PVE folklore goes, heroism and fearlessness ran through Lou Warnick’s blood from an early age. Tales abound the city about his storming with only his uniform on his back into a home ablaze, exiting with half a dozen spared children clinging to his back, arms and legs. Then there is the story of Lou “the Warlock” Warnick posting up firmly in front of the Neighborhood Church, hiding calmly in the shade of a large ficus tree only to be jolted into action at the sight of evil drug traffickers that, as the tale has been told, he first detected with his supernatural hearing landing along the cove’s rocky shore below .
Lou “the Warlock” Warnick issues a stern directive with his manual scepter – a command that no God fearing man can ignore. Countless lives have been saved at the tip of his wand.
How Reserve Officers Like Warnick Can Save the PVEPD (click here to see the low cost solution to PVE’s low risk crime)
Then there is the storied romance between Lou and his beautiful wife Eileen. Long before Lou became one of Motorola’s prized employees specializing in radios and antennas, young Eileen gallivanted into Lou’s purview and their eyes locked onto each other. The electricity was that of a lightning bolt – and the two became inseparable. It has been said that the Warlock often thinks “What would Eileen want me to do” before engaging in his latest heroic act. Torrance is blessed to have them protecting those neighbors fortunate enough to have Lou always on guard.
NOMINATED to PVEPD WALL OF FAME:
Officer Rebecca Garcia (Unknown – Present)
Officer Rebecca Garcia continues to impress PVE residents with her professionalism and related refusal to selectively enforce the law. Many have commented that she seems worthy of promotion to a higher rank sooner than later.
Warlock (def.): man who practices witchcraft; a sorcerer.
This web page and related posts and commentary represent both facts and opinions of the Coalition to Save PVE about public figures, as protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Comments made by third parties represent their own representations of facts and own opinions.
Palos Verdes Estates residents need a solution to Tony D